Published: Thursday, May 21st 2020
Having worked from home these past two months, it all of a sudden dawned on me that I should perhaps check whether Internet traffic had indeed increased now with Corona and everything, when rumors have it that all people do in their spare time these days is binge-watching Netflix.
I headed over to Netnod’s website, the company running the biggest Internet Exchange points in Sweden, to have a look at their traffic graphs. This is their two-year aggregate graph as of today for their POPs:
It does indeed look as if April 2020 reaches some sort of peak. Perhaps that’s due to the average growth of traffic on these POPs, perhaps it’s Corona. I don’t know. But if my vision is anything to go by, it looks as if the April 2019 average was about 1.6 TBit/s and the April 2020 average is somewhere around 2.0 TBit/s. If that’s true, that’s a year-over-year increase of 25%. Perhaps people indeed are on Zoom and Netflix a bit more this April.
Published: Tuesday, May 19th 2020
Apparently founded only last year, a private equity fund called Ethos Capital with just a single page website as their only online presence, last year offered to purchase Public Interest Registry, or PIR, the registry for the .ORG domain, from Internet Society (ISOC) for the neat sum of US $1.1 billion.
Ethos would have made a leveraged buyout and financed some of the sale by loading up PIR with US$ 360 million in debt. The sale would obviously expanded the coffers of ISOC, an organization with annual revenues around US$ 50 million, so ISOC roundly accepted the offer.
I rarely see things as black and white, but to me this proposed sale was definitely in the gray area. It felt a bit dirty for ISOC to sell off the registry that is the caretaker of the 10.3 million .ORG domains for the world’s non-profits, non-commercials, and charitable organizations to some LBO boys on a PE fund.
Apparently a lot of people and organizations thought the same. EFF and NTEN’s open letter to ISOC, PIR, and ICANN to reject the sale was endorsed by more than 27,000 people and roughly 900 organizations. Even California’s Attorney General urged ICANN to reject the sale.
On April 30th, ICANN officially rejected the deal - and my inbox was instantly filled with happy cheers from various organizations I follow. The question now, however, is how ISOC and PIR will move forward. In recent blog posts from both of them, it’s now back to normal. EFF on the other hand makes the assessment that ISOC has made it clear it no longer wants the responsibility of being the steward of PIR, so even though the dust has now settled a bit, it will be interesting to see what comes out of this process.
I’m myself a very inactive member of ISOC-SE, the Swedish Chapter of ISOC. I’m pretty sure ISOC-SE has only been in the fringes of this process, if that, but I have a few distant friends within ISOC-SE who are substantially more active, so I’m quite curious what thoughts they have on these developments. I’ll make sure to ask.